Server List · 110+ Countries / 170+ Servers
Server Nodes & Global Routes
VPNFP's international routes come in three types — IEPL dedicated lines, transit and direct — covering Asia-Pacific, North America, Europe and other major regions. This page lists sample routes, explains how the three types differ, and offers concrete advice on choosing a route for each use case.
Sample Routes by Region
The table below groups sample VPNFP routes by region. Each entry shows the country/region, city, route type and streaming support. In the streaming column, "Yes" means the route can access major international streaming platforms such as Netflix and YouTube; "Partial" means only some platforms or some regional catalogs are available; "—" means the route is intended for general access and is not optimized for streaming.
| Country / Region | City | Route Type | Streaming |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asia-Pacific | |||
| Hong Kong SAR | Hong Kong | IEPL dedicated line | Yes |
| Japan | Tokyo | IEPL dedicated line | Yes |
| Singapore | Singapore | IEPL dedicated line | Yes |
| South Korea | Seoul | Transit | Yes |
| Taiwan | Taipei | Transit | Yes |
| Thailand | Bangkok | Transit | Partial |
| Malaysia | Kuala Lumpur | Transit | Partial |
| Philippines | Manila | Direct | — |
| North America | |||
| United States | Los Angeles | IEPL dedicated line | Yes |
| United States | San Jose | IEPL dedicated line | Yes |
| United States | Seattle | Transit | Yes |
| United States | New York | Transit | Yes |
| Canada | Toronto | Transit | Yes |
| Canada | Vancouver | Transit | Partial |
| Europe | |||
| Germany | Frankfurt | IEPL dedicated line | Yes |
| United Kingdom | London | IEPL dedicated line | Yes |
| Netherlands | Amsterdam | IEPL dedicated line | Yes |
| France | Paris | Transit | Yes |
| Switzerland | Zurich | Transit | Partial |
| Spain | Madrid | Transit | Partial |
| Italy | Milan | Transit | — |
| Other Regions | |||
| Australia | Sydney | Transit | Yes |
| New Zealand | Auckland | Transit | Partial |
| United Arab Emirates | Dubai | Transit | — |
| Brazil | São Paulo | Transit | — |
| South Africa | Johannesburg | Transit | — |
| Turkey | Istanbul | Direct | — |
How the Three Route Types Differ
The route type determines the path your data takes from your device to the international network, which directly affects the stability and peak-hour performance of the cross-border link. VPNFP offers all three types, and you can switch between them in the client at any time — there is no separate charge for different route types. In terms of cost, IEPL dedicated lines are the highest, followed by transit, then direct routes; but every route is available within the same plan, and plans are billed by data only.
IEPL dedicated line
Point-to-point cross-border dedicated line
IEPL (International Ethernet Private Line) is a point-to-point cross-border Ethernet dedicated line. Traffic travels over a carrier-owned private circuit from entry to exit and never touches the public internet backbone. The advantages are a fixed path and immunity to congestion on public network segments, so throughput typically stays stable during evening peaks and holidays — ideal for workloads that demand stability. Dedicated bandwidth is purchased from upstream carriers, making this the most expensive of the three types, so it is generally deployed first in high-density hubs such as Hong Kong, Tokyo, Singapore, Los Angeles and Frankfurt.
Transit
Relayed through transit servers
A transit route first passes through a transit server in your country or a nearby region, then forwards to an exit server in the destination country. The transit node handles entry aggregation and path optimization, steering traffic away from poorly performing segments of the cross-border public network. It costs less than a dedicated line and has the widest coverage, making it the mainstay of the 170+ routes — well suited to everyday browsing, research, standard-definition streaming and most other uses. Peak-hour performance depends on congestion along the public segment at the time; if speeds wobble, switching to another transit route in the same region usually restores them.
Direct
Direct connection to exit servers
A direct route connects your device straight to the exit server in the destination country, with no transit layer in between. The path is shortest and the setup simplest, giving snappy response when link conditions are good. And because there is no transit server in the chain, it is the cheapest of the three types. Direct routes are usually deployed in nearby Asia-Pacific locations and suit lightweight, latency-sensitive uses with modest bandwidth needs, such as reading text content or instant messaging. When the cross-border public network congests, direct routes fluctuate more visibly than transit or dedicated lines.
All three route types are labeled in the client's route list. The basic rule of thumb: for stability first, pick an IEPL dedicated line; for coverage and value, pick transit; for lightweight, low-latency uses, try direct. Switching routes within the same subscription costs nothing extra, so in practice it is worth trying a few routes for the same task and going with whichever performs best on your own network.
Route Recommendations by Use Case
Different use cases demand different things from a route: some care about throughput and stability, others about latency and path length. Below are recommendations for five common use cases, all based on the characteristics of the three route types described above.
Everyday browsing and research
Visiting international websites, looking things up, using search engines — these put low demands on bandwidth but high demands on availability. Start with an Asia-Pacific transit route such as Hong Kong, Tokyo, Seoul or Singapore; they are geographically close, the path is short, and everyday pages load briskly. If a particular site misbehaves, first switch to another route in the same region, then consider a North American route — most such issues come down to differences between exit IP ranges.
Streaming and video
HD and 4K video need sustained throughput, and evening-peak fluctuations show up directly as buffering and dropped quality. Prefer IEPL dedicated lines labeled "Yes" for streaming (Hong Kong, Tokyo, Singapore, Los Angeles, Frankfurt, etc.) — the fixed path keeps peak-hour throughput steady. When watching region-specific catalogs, pick the exit city in the corresponding country, since catalog availability is determined by the geolocation of the exit IP.
AI tools
When using AI tools like ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini, connection stability matters more than peak bandwidth — a session dropped mid-conversation hurts more than a slow load. Choose dedicated lines in busy hub cities such as Hong Kong, Tokyo, Singapore or Los Angeles, where route quality and exit IP reputation tend to be better. AI platforms restrict some IP ranges, so if a tool will not open, switching to another route in the same region usually fixes it.
Gaming and real-time apps
Real-time applications like games and voice calls care most about latency and jitter, and latency is determined by geographic distance plus the number of forwarding hops. Pick the nearest Asia-Pacific route, and try direct or transit first — fewer hops, shorter paths. Dedicated lines are stable, but if the exit city is far away, latency may not be in their favor. For games with regional servers, choose the exit city to match the server region: Los Angeles or San Jose for US servers, Frankfurt or London for EU servers.
Remote work and collaboration
Accessing company systems, joining video calls, syncing cloud documents — these need both stability and low latency, and work hours usually avoid the evening peak. Stick to one or two proven dedicated or transit routes rather than switching constantly; video calls are sensitive to upstream stability, where a dedicated line's fixed path has the edge. VPNFP places no limit on simultaneous devices, so teams can assign different exit cities to different devices.
General principles
A sensible order for choosing: first pick the route type based on your use case (dedicated for stability, transit for coverage, direct for low latency), then pick the exit city based on where the target service is located, and finally compare two or three candidates on your own network. Route experience depends on your local ISP and the time of day, so treat others' conclusions as reference only — the live route list in the client and your own actual connections are the final word.
Coverage & Regional Distribution
VPNFP currently covers 110+ countries / 170+ servers, allocated by usage density: hub cities in Asia-Pacific and North America are served mostly by IEPL dedicated lines; major European cities have both dedicated lines and transit; other regions are covered by transit routes. Below is a regional overview — for specific cities, see the route list in the client.
Asia-Pacific
Hong Kong · Tokyo · Seoul · Singapore · Taipei · Bangkok · Kuala Lumpur
North America
Los Angeles · San Jose · Seattle · New York · Toronto · Vancouver
Europe
Frankfurt · London · Amsterdam · Paris · Zurich · Madrid
Oceania
Sydney · Auckland
Middle East
Dubai · Istanbul
South America / Africa
São Paulo · Johannesburg
All routes work with the Windows / macOS / iOS / Android / Linux clients, and one account has no limit on simultaneous devices. For plan pricing and data allowances see the pricing page, or view and activate plans directly in the user panel.